Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies
Matthew Arnold is the starting point of any discussion of culture. His ideas of culture were refuted by the twentieth century culture theorists. Matthew Arnold in his Culture and Anarchy said that culture is primarily a body of knowledge. He sees the popular culture as a form of anarchy. He was a strict Classist. The flag bearer of Arnold's idea of culture as an elitist form in twentieth century was F.R. Leavis.
The real cultural studies project begins with activities of Centre for CCC at the University of Birmingham in 1964. Its aim is to put cultural studies on the intellectual map. The works of Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams, E.P. Thompson and Stuart Hall are regarded as the foundational texts of cultural studies
Williams offers the possibility of a democratic definition of culture as the 'lived experience of ordinary' men and women, made in their daily interaction with the texts and practices of everyday life. This is democratic in the sense that it subverts the hierarchical structures of culture that Leavis proposes. However, Williams is against the equation that popular culture is working class culture, people are what they consume. Indeed, the popular is 'instituted, financed and operated by the commercial bourgeoisie', against authentic working class evolution.
In 'Cultural studies: two paradigms', Hall analyzes the problems of the two approaches in the discipline. While culturalism (Hoggart and Thompson) privileges 'lived' experience as the agent of social change, structuralism (Levi-Strauss and Barthes) argues experience itself is socially constructed, an 'effect of language and culture. Hall gives articulation a Marxist perspective by bringing in Gramsci and Althusser, and thus CCCS emerges as a collaborative research hub (of theory and praxis) in the historical context of 1968. Hall endeavours to legitimize not only new methods for defining and studying culture but also whole new domains of cultural production. Especially influential are his works on critical race theory, ethnicity, immigration, and "diasporic identities", which points to a new direction in British Cultural Studies towards postcolonialisms.
Cultural
studies generally share four goals. They are:
- Cultural studies go beyond the limits of a particular subject such as literary history or criticism.
- Cultural studies are politically active. Cultural critics see themselves as against the power structures of the society. They question the inequalities of the power structures and seek to restructure them.
- Cultural studies deny the separation of “high” and “low” or popular culture. All forms of cultural productions are studied in relation to other cultural practices.
- Cultural studies analyses not only the cultural work that is produced but also the means of production.
There are significant differences between British and US Cultural Studies. The British form emerges out of the sociological and materialist studies of people like Williams and Hoggart, who were associated with the Birmingham Centre. By the early 1980s, with Hall at the head of the Centre, new emphases on multiculturalism and the problems of immigration, exile, and Diaspora brought Cultural Studies into the postcolonial orbit. Culture Studies in the USA from the 1950s to the 1980s is primarily concerned with the historical analysis of national characteristics (major political figures and parties, economics). By the mid-1980s, new forms of cultural critique like the writing cultures' movement in anthropology’ which advocated a textualist approach to the representation of culture, emerge as the new waves. With renewed interest in areas like film, theatre, performance, pop culture, clothing, sporting events, new media and pornography, its scope is widening and currently, English departments are currently being redesignated as culture studies departments. Donna Haraway, Teresa de Lauretis, Slavoj Zizek, Iain Chambers, Angela McRobbie and Janice Radway are some important practitioners of contemporary cultural studies.
Comments
Post a Comment